1981) (The chancellor's determination must be reasonable and commensurate with the wife's accustomed standard of living taking into account the wife's own resources and the husband's ability to pay.). Upon Mrs. Retzer's promise never to stray again, he paid off the overdraft. 278 So. Summary: Shirley Kratzer is 81 years old and was born on 08/05/1938. II, at 230-33. 2d at 423 (where this Court had "no *602 inclination to disturb the Chancellor's decree" since the non-custodial parent was ordered to expend "only 23 percent of his income"). Moreover, if Mike decides to sell his interest in R & R, then issues not now before this Court may arise and warrant reconsideration and modification of the decree. As to the first factor, she made no substantial contribution to the accumulation of the total wealth of Mr. Retzer and her. 611, 617, 64 So. I, at 46; Vol. In 1972, after Mike completed his tour with the Air Force and Nancy graduated, the Retzers moved to Greenville, Mississippi, where they opened their own McDonald's fast-food restaurant. He stated this would later be recouped because he had purchased three memberships, and when he sold two of them, his investment would be returned. She also testified that he was the only man she had ever loved, and that she wanted to resume the marriage. This Court like the chancellor is not convinced by Mike's adamant stance that an adulteress deserves nothing while an adulterer deserves all. It lists $44,200 cash assets. III, 138). The chancellor fashioned the periodic alimony award to fit the unique circumstances of the case; he deserves commendation for daring to be innovative. Had Mrs. Wood been granted a divorce from her husband in this case, the alimony award manifestly would have shocked the conscience as being pitifully inadequate. 2d 443, 447 (1948); Hulett v. Hulett, 152 Miss. Currently, Shirley lives in Winfield, PA. Background details that you might want to know about Shirley include: ethnicity is Caucasian, whose political affiliation is currently a registered Republican; and religious views are listed as Christian. At the August, 1988, hearing she could not recall what the surgery was for or the amount she had paid. Mr. Retzer, active in the Republican Party, had also financed an expensive dinner in Washington for state and national political leaders. That is, the facts of the case sub judice do not seem to fit within the realm of the doctrine's construct. 2d 793 (Miss. 2d 1052, 1056 (Miss. Fee, LEA, Tom Gregory und Niklas Kaul erhielten den "Audi Generation Award 2019 In einer kinderreichen Familie half er schon früh auf den Baumwollfeldern aus, die sein Vater gepachtet hatte. If that is extravagant management, many investors would welcome the opportunity to have a stake in it. Donahue, 328 N.E.2d at 512; Knaebel v. Heiner, 663 P.2d 551, 552 (Alaska 1983). See e.g., Carr v. Carr, 480 So. Following soul searching discussions lasting several weeks, they agreed to resume the marriage, both, however, solemnly promising to be faithful thereafter. 1970), and its progeny. [1] They had assignations at a selected house on Highway 82 and at Lake Ferguson in Washington County, in Louisiana, and in Arkansas. [2] The chancellor in his September 7, 1988, opinion estimated that the net worth of them both, consisting mainly of the value of the restaurants, was $4,100,000. The record supports the chancellor's fact-finding with which the parties virtually did not dispute during oral arguments before this Court. 2d 409, 411 (Miss. Like his net worth, Mike's yearly income compared to Nancy's is also substantial. 2d 1044 (Miss. 2d 435, 438 (Miss. After their separation, in January, 1988, Mr. Retzer left a restaurant in Greenwood late one night with a woman named "Linda." 2d 782. Shirley M Retzer 1407 Ridge Ave Steubenville, OH 43952 Age 91 (Born Feb 1929) (740) 282-2415. Mrs. Retzer did meet the second factor it was a long marriage. See also, Harrell v. Harrell, 231 So. The amount Mike must pay is also substantially less than that which is recommended by statute. Mr. Retzer testified at trial that she could live there as long as she chose. Id. There was no manifest error in the chancellor's ordering Mr. Retzer to see that she received an income of $7,333.33 per month from Retzer and Retzer. As discussed in a preceding subsection, a "Balance Sheet" indicates that Mike alone is worth over $4 million (probably a conservative figure) which is over 300% more than Nancy's worth. They each had separate personal bank accounts. 2d 846 (1965); Brabham v. Brabham, 226 Miss. „Otto Maximale“, benannt nach seiner inflationären Verwendung des Superlativs, wurde mit drei verschiedenen Teams im heimischen Oberhaus siebenmal Meister und stand mit Rapid (1985) und Austria Salzburg (1994) auch zweimal im Finale von Europacupwettbewerben. II, at 203-07 (emphasis added). They should each feel free to do so, so long as there would be no public knowledge, and only the two of them knew of any such activity. Mrs. Retzer confronted him and he admitted it was true, and agreed to give Mrs. Retzer a divorce, to be obtained on the ground of irreconcilable differences. Also, at one time she attempted to help settle a strike. At trial this young lady, who in 1982 had been an employee of the Greenwood business, testified Mr. Retzer had made a sexual proposition to her, indeed suggested that she be his mistress. 1980). He did admit to receiving the telephone call from the young man, who he said was drunk, and according to Mr. Retzer, he told him never to call him again. Miss. {{collectionsDisplayName(searchView.appliedFilters)}}, 'Nur zur redaktionellen Verwendung' ausschließen, {{searchText.groupByEventToggleImages()}}, {{searchText.groupByEventToggleEvents()}}. Finden Sie perfekte Stock-Fotos zum Thema Shirley Retzer sowie redaktionelle Newsbilder von Getty Images. In both these cases the husband had been granted a divorce from the wife on adultery, and in both cases the wife was awarded alimony, but in meager sums. Through the divorce decree, Nancy was awarded custody of the Retzers' two children; she was also awarded both lump-sum and periodic alimony. He also allowed her accountant's fee of $4,940 and attorney's fee of $7,585. At that time they were in something of a financial bind, and in order to pay these bills, Mr. Retzer agreed to go on her note at a bank for $27,000. He has no lump sum alimony obligation from these acquisitions during a period when she was committing adultery and living a profligate life-style. Restated, Mike had the burden to show: (1) that the alimony award was unwarranted; or (2) that the award should be modified due to unreasonableness. In Gatlin, 248 Miss. On July 13, 1987, the investigator reported the house to Mr. Retzer, who went to it, and discovered familiar items of personal property. 2d at 1302; Clark, 293 So. In the twelve months following April, 1987, Mrs. Retzer did not curtail her purchase of items of personal luxury. In Tedford v. Dempsey, this Court delineated a general guideline which a chancellor should consider before entering a child support decree: 437 So. The couple moved to Greenville, where Mrs. Retzer taught in the public school system. 1986); Tutor v. Tutor, 494 So. In determining the amount of support which Mike must provide, the chancellor held a separate hearing to ascertain the Retzers' net worth. 2d 778 (Miss. Mr. Retzer, on the other hand, testified Mrs. Retzer always spent beyond their means, and none of her funds went into the business. Mr. Wood, on the other hand, had an annual income of $40,000 of which $8,400 was non-taxable. With the exception of Mrs. Retzer's charge that Mr. Retzer had propositioned the young lady in Greenwood, the only evidence in the record that Mr. Retzer behaved in any way improperly from the time of their reconciliation in 1979 until they separated in July, 1987, was in the summer of 1982. During the hearings, Mike contended that, because he was granted a divorce on the grounds of adultery, Nancy should receive only that which she "legally" owns and nothing more. Id. For example, the following figures reflect the salaries each received from R & R during 1984 to 1987: *601 Vol. She admitted spending over $2,700 on furnishings, of which $814 was charged to the corporation. The son of Sebastian Retzer and Theresa Elizabeth Schreiber, George married Mary Smith on 28 Oct 1880 in Calhoun County, Illinois. 1989). 1977) (holding that a court is justified in piercing the corporate veil where, to do otherwise, would "subvert the ends of justice"); Caroline Transformer Co. v. Anderson, 341 So. First, the wife had through her efforts been a material economic benefit in the creation of her husband's wealth, such as quitting her job to help him in his business or profession, helping him through college, working in his business or profession, and frequently offering him valuable counseling in his business or investments. Recently-enacted statutory law provides a more specific guideline. The chancellor's decree seems fair to both parties. Giving her credit for this, an almost equal ownership in the corporation was an eminently fair return. He said they left the restaurant and drove to the club, where they parked and talked. 1980); Russell v. Russell, 241 So. Miller v. Miller, 173 Miss. The IBM strategic repository for digital assets such as images and videos is located at dam.ibm.com. 1984)); but see Appellant's Brief at 28-29 (where Mike seems to suggest, erroneously, that this Court's standard of review is: "whether there has been a material change of circumstances") (citing and quoting Smith v. Todd, 464 So. 2d 1300 (Miss. Mrs. Retzer's personal income from the corporation that year was $21,600, leaving her a balance of $4,656.67. See, Wires v. Wires, 297 So. And "Mike, himself, told the Court that any money spent on the children was not wasted." Mrs. Retzer did not deny her extravagance, and admitted she was a poor manager, giving as her only excuse that he, too, overspent. Otto Retzer was born on September 13, 1945 in Lölling [now in Hüttenberg], en, service@filmmakers.de | [2], Retzer ist verheiratet und hat zwei Kinder, darunter die Filmeditorin Olivia Retzer. 2d 1359 (Fla.App. Mrs. Retzer was an only child. Nancy finally adds that the "best way to understand the weakness of Mike's position is to assume that the [chancellor] denied any monthly payments ... and left Mike in charge of R & R." "Mike would have control indefinitely of Nancy's income producing assets and keep all profits realized on Nancy's property without paying Nancy anything.". The following was initially prepared as the majority opinion. The decree simply establishes an amount of periodic alimony which Mike must pay Nancy based upon the Retzers' past earnings and it permits Mike to offset the alimony payments by the amount which Nancy receives from the corporation in the form of salary, dividends, and so forth. With less than $30,000 in 1971, the business had grown and flourished, and they were quite wealthy in 1988. He then awarded her $88,000 per year alimony ($7,333.33 per month), with the provision that any sum paid by the corporation to her in dividends would be deducted from the alimony due her. 2d 834 (Miss. "The woman needs no encouragement to spend vast sums of money." VI, 658) She had personal notes at several banks in Greenville. Mr. Retzer described the problem during cross-examination: Mr. Retzer testified that of the salaries and bonuses each received from the corporation it was their initial intention for Mrs. Retzer to pay for the groceries and children's clothes out of her compensation, and he would pay all their other expenses from his salary and bonus, including mortgage payment, interest, insurance, taxes. Join Facebook to connect with Shirley Retz and others you may know. 2d 147 (1955); Windham v. Windham, 218 Miss. She chose instead to go to Houston, Texas, for its removal and for the cosmetic surgery. Mr. Retzer does have substantial financial obligations to Mrs. Retzer, however, arising from her ownership of almost half of the shares of Retzer and Retzer, Inc. Courts look quite differently upon the respective duties existing between majority and minority shareholders in publicly held and close corporations. 1985) ("This Court holds that the fact of adultry [sic] alone does not disqualify a parent from custodianship, but that the pollster [sic] consideration in original custody determinations is the best interest and welfare of the minor child."). All this aside, the chancellor rejected Mike's contention "that when the divorce *603 is awarded due to the adultry [sic] of the wife that she is not entitled to any alimony" under Mississippi case law: Vol. Wie reich ist Otto Retzer? A "Balance Sheet" prepared by Mike unequivocally shows that his and Nancy's combined net worth is at least $5.5 million.[1]. The chancellor's innovative decision-making is affirmed. Otto Retzer Vermögen wird auf rund 3 Millionen Euro geschätzt. More specifically, this doctrine generally applies to two broad categories of cases: (1) Those "in which a third party seeks to hold shareholders individually liable" for corporate debts; and (2) Those in which "a shareholder utilizes a corporation to perform indirectly acts which the shareholder could not legally perform as an individual." *608 The chancellor's decision accounts for the fact that Mike, as R & R's majority shareholder, could manipulate the corporation's by-laws, policies, or decisions in such a way that would ultimately deplete Nancy's income (which derives almost solely from R & R in salary form). Despite this she spent $530 for a piece of jewelry for her maid, and another $3,800 for a pin for an anniversary present for herself. He reported this to Mrs. Retzer. The business was quite successful. (Vol. Nach der Mittelschule begann Adi Peichl 1964 eine Lehre als Schriftsetzer. The chancellor's fact-finding is illustrative: Appellee's Brief at 3-4 (citations omitted). V, 249). She said she *587 secured $57,000 in loans to pay off her debts. (Vol. VIII, 1138). He awarded Mrs. Retzer $2,500 per month in child support. The chancellor rendered an opinion July 8 awarding Mr. Retzer a divorce on the ground of adultery. All of these license agreements were assigned to this corporation, making it the owner of the five restaurants. Mrs. Retzer kept a copious card supply in stock to have on hand to mail to various friends and acquaintances upon the appropriate occasion. Thereafter in Clark v. Clark, 293 So. [1] Mrs. Retzer testified it resumed the last of 1983 or early 1984. Affectionate greeting card exchanges were made. Mrs. Retzer did not meet the third and fourth factors because she will have a separate income or estate and financial security without any lump sum award. Going to the instant case, Mrs. Retzer must fail in the first instance because she was not granted a divorce. 2d 146, 147 (Miss. The decree of the chancery court is accordingly reversed and rendered on the $275,000 lump sum award to Mrs. Retzer, and affirmed on the award of custody of the children. At a pendente lite hearing before the chancellor in February, 1988, Mrs. Retzer requested he pay her another $3,000 monthly in order "to pay her additional debts and maintain her standard of living." See, Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 278 Or. Following *592 these cases this Court considered lump sum awards alone or in conjunction with periodic alimony in Jones, supra; Skinner v. Skinner, 509 So. Through her counter-complaint, Nancy requested both lump-sum and periodic alimony. Seinen Geburtstag feierte … She later did advise as to the interior decoration and employees' uniforms. While their interest as husband and wife was essentially identical, now they are adverse to each other. A daughter, Kathryn Reed Retzer, was born to their marriage July 1, 1976. 201, 422 N.E.2d 798 (1981) (holding minority shareholders also have fiduciary duties to majority shareholders). Mrs. Retzer also consulted with a psychiatrist in Jackson, but the purpose is not in the record. Insofar as this record reveals, both Mr. and Mrs. Retzer tried to devote time and interest to their children. 1987) in the actual framing of the issue. 2d at 42, the wife was sick, unable to make a living and was having to live with her parents, and her was husband partially at fault. Reeves, 410 So. It would take the wisdom of Solomon to know at this time what is truly in the best interest of these children, and we do not feel constrained to reverse the chancellor on his custody award. This statement shows annual salaries of Mr. and Mrs. Retzer to be, respectively, $13,200 and $7,100. Now, through ownership of ten more shares than she, Mr. Retzer has control of the management of Retzer and Retzer. The Retzers also receive income from other sources (e.g., from Retco); their joint federal and state income tax returns reveal that they received a gross income of $455,595 in 1986. Beacham v. Beacham, 383 So. In each of these cases the ability of the husband to pay alimony was coupled with an inability of the wife to make a living or support herself. An exception to this rule has been made in cases where the marriage has been of long duration, the husband is able to pay alimony in some amount, and the wife has no means of livelihood. He rationalizes, for the most part, that the amount "compare[s] favorably with [various] public officials[']" 1987 salaries (e.g., "Clerk of the Supreme Court earns $31,000, which is less than the amount which he must pay to support his two children each year). 857, 858, 56 So. Nancy subsequently moved for withdrawal of her cross-appeal, and she now seeks affirmance of the chancellor's *598 award. Typically, she would incur a large bill, pay something like $100 month for six to eight months, and then the "crunch" would come. Where divorce has been granted to the husband on the ground of the wife's adultery, however, this Court has consistently denied any alimony, period. Mr. Retzer deposited $36,009.67 from his account to hers. Mr. Retzer began operating a sole proprietorship business in his own name as "Retco" in 1979. 1970). Anna lived in … Zu viele Bilder ausgewählt. App. The chancellor then concluded that the Retzers' net worth was approximately $4.1 million $3 million of which was in Mike's name. According to her, all of her teacher's salary went into a joint savings account and was part of the cash assets used to invest in the business. The Retzer family name was found in the USA, the UK, and Canada between 1840 and 1920. The restaurants were incorporated as Retzer & Retzer ("R & R"), and all equipment used in the restaurants was leased from Retco, another corporation of the Retzers'. 2d 756, 758 (1953) (on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment); Carraway v. Carraway, 212 Miss. Once the loan had been made, Mrs. Retzer informed him of another $8,000 in bills she had forgotten, and the corporation thereupon gave her a bonus of $12,000. The alleged advance Mr. Retzer made to an employee in 1982, if true, is hardly praiseworthy, but it is a far cry from the record proof of Mrs. Retzer's continued, sustained infidelities culminating in the July, 1987, separation. 1985) ("From this Court's view of the entire opinion, it concludes that the chancellor applied the rule of best interest and welfare of the children to his custody determination.") Hier können Sie Inhalte sammeln, auswählen und Anmerkungen zu Ihren Dateien hinterlegen. Wählen Sie bis maximal 100 Bilder zum Herunterladen aus. He must manage the corporation prudently, and after paying necessary and reasonable expenses, and setting aside whatever is reasonably necessary for corporate reserves and equipment and facilities, pay her 49.8% of the net remaining. At the time of his death, George was 80 years, 2 … She never purchased any stocks or bonds, or had a savings account. Susanne Lothar starb am Mittwoch mit nur 51 Jahren. Dann streckte ihn ein Grippevirus nieder. Mr. Retzer testified he could only recall the young woman's name as "Linda," that he had been working that day at his places of business and went to the restaurant that evening. (Vol. Am bekanntesten ist er für Ein Schloß am Wörthersee (1990), Her mit den kleinen Schweinchen (1984) und Das Traumhotel (2004). ), review denied 475 So. 1977) (same). The chancellor's reasoning upon which the alimony award was based is persuasive and fair. 2d at 438. Check out the latest pictures, photos and images of Shirley Retzer. CODE ANN. Her checking account in Planters Bank was constantly overdrawn. Both Michael and Nancy admitted to committing adultery. Mrs. Retzer attempted suicide upon one occasion at their home in Greenville by swallowing a number of pills. Drinkwater prepared this agreement by Mr. Retzer as well. Having spent over $50,000 in 1986 on purely personal luxuries, Mrs. Retzer nevertheless in March, 1987, found herself over $40,000 in debt for unpaid bills for purely personal luxuries, and the debts for her personal luxuries in 1987 continued to mount. 138, 144, 171 So. Mrs. Retzer owns 49.8% of the shares in Retzer and Retzer, the corporate owner of five commercially successful McDonald's restaurants, which should afford her a substantial income. In 1982 when Mrs. Retzer was pregnant, an irate male employee of the Greenwood restaurant telephoned their home and told Mr. Retzer to leave his girl friend alone. 874, 877, 27 So. 2d 884, 885 (1946). VI, at 618 (As noted previously, R & R comprises the Retzers' seven McDonald's restaurants and is responsible for virtually all the wealth they accumulated during the marriage.). Shirley Retzer 420 Myra Rd Rosamond v. Rosamond, 250 Miss. The most Retzer families were found in the USA in 1920. Nancy counters that Mike admitted committing adulterous acts with several women, including a next-door neighbor, in the Retzers' marital home.